top of page

Beyond the Resume: Why LinkedIn Belongs in Mental Health Policy Conversations

  • Writer:  Shreya Sinha
    Shreya Sinha
  • May 4
  • 5 min read
 Image that pairs with many updates (LinkedIn 2025).
Image that pairs with many updates (LinkedIn 2025).

“I’m excited to share…”


This phrase has become a LinkedIn staple, accompanied by 1 of 16 LinkedIn celebratory GIFs. A student announces a summer internship, another celebrates a research position. Your closest friend reveals their first-place finish at the country’s largest Hackathon. Someone else reflects on dropping out of college for a semester and launching a startup. LinkedIn has transformed from a mere social media platform into a hub for discovering professional development opportunities, industry-specific communities, and connections. Every post is polished, grateful, and optimistic for what the future holds.


But for many students, reading these updates evokes the opposite. A never-ending cycle of stress and anxiety. A lingering question: am I really doing enough?


LinkedIn wasn’t always this distorted, egocentric breeding zone, as expressed by Reddit users. Founded in December 2002 by Reif Hoffman and team, officially launching in May 2003, the platform sought “to connect the world’s professionals and make them more productive and successful.” Established in Mountain View, California, LinkedIn grew rapidly, reaching 90 million users in 2010. Today, it is the world’s largest professional network with over 1.2 billion global users.


On college campuses like the University of California, Berkeley, LinkedIn is no longer optional. Actively encouraging students to join early, build their profiles, and begin networking, universities utilize Career Centers, student organizations, and advisors to emphasize their importance. Having a LinkedIn profile isn’t just a means of integrating into the professional landscape, but an expectation—a defining attribute of the modern college experience. Now normalized, this expectation reflects a complex reality, offering connectedness and opportunity while simultaneously introducing undesired feelings of comparison, pressure, and emotional strain.


LinkedIn “Lingo”

Similar to Instagram and TikTok, users of LinkedIn are experiencing the inevitable effects of social media. Instead of comparing lifestyles or appearance, however, LinkedIn centers its comparison around achievement. Internships, research positions, and career milestones reflect the importance of hustle culture and the need for constant achievement. Some articles even describe LinkedIn as the best social network for self-loathing. Your worth becomes tied to your resume, and scrolling through posts becomes a competition, with students measuring their own progress against others’ success.


This dynamic is reinforced by the platform’s culture. Structurally, every LinkedIn user is the same. All profiles consist of a headline, summary, list of experiences, skills, and curated visuals that attune to who they are and what they plan on pursuing. Likewise, posts follow familiar scripts like “grateful to share” or “thrilled to announce”, that turn milestones into narratives of achievement. Over time, a recognizable LinkedIn voice emerges, encouraging students to adopt tones and certain compositions to remain competitive. If a post does not conform to these standards, post engagement and visibility may be lower than expected. The absence of visible failure and rejection further distorts reality, creating the impression that constant success is the norm.


This idea is not just theorized, but backed by extensive research. A study published in the National Library of Medicine found that participants who used LinkedIn at least once a week had significantly increased levels of depression and anxiety. While causality could not be determined, researchers suggested that users may feel guilty for wasting time and be unable to measure up to students around them, in turn experiencing lowered self-esteem and overall life satisfaction after scrolling through others’ accomplishments.


Nonetheless, LinkedIn is often described as a double-edged sword, fostering connection and self-efficacy while strengthening professional identity and access to opportunities. However, it can also generate stress, anxiety, and imposter syndrome. Students report feeling inadequate when comparing their own achievements with those of others on LinkedIn, with pressures to maintain a good profile, continuously update achievements, and measure up to peers. The result? A cycle of overthinking when progress is slow, persistent feelings of self-doubt, and intense self-criticism.


The Policy Gap

Despite its widespread use and measurable impact, LinkedIn remains largely absent from campus mental health policy and awareness discussions.


Colleges have increasingly recognized mental health as a significant public health concern that demands attention, broadening counseling services and launching wellness initiatives to de-stigmatize and expand access to mental health resources. However, these efforts primarily focus on downstream interventions: micro-level strategies that treat consequences rather than root causes. Campuses have relied on helping students cope with stress and anxiety instead of addressing the issue before it occurs.


At the same time, institutions continue to promote platforms and practices that intensify emotional pressures rather than relieve them. LinkedIn is embedded in educational cultures around the world, with Career Centers highlighting its importance in enhancing one’s employability prospects, professional branding, and networking. Advisors treat the platform as an essential component of a student’s career, yet rarely address its potential drawbacks. Student organizations hold workshops on professional development and profile optimization. Professors and peers reinforce that maintaining a polished LinkedIn profile is not optional, but expected. Digital wellness initiatives often overlook LinkedIn entirely, seeing it as a productive platform rather than a space capable of generating harm.


In college environments, LinkedIn begins to feel less like a resource and more like a requirement. Somehow, universities are addressing the consequences of stress while simultaneously reinforcing the conditions that produce it.


So, what’s the fix?


From Downstream to Upstream: A Public Health Approach

Addressing this disconnect requires a shift towards upstream interventions: strategies on the macro-level that target the root cause of an issue instead of merely the symptoms. This concept is foundational in global health; however, its physical integration remains limited and uneven.


As a start, universities can begin by examining the environments they create and promote at the institutional level. Digital professional literacy workshops could teach students how to use LinkedIn effectively while also protecting their well-being. Others could address social comparison, imposter syndrome, and burnout.


Universities can also work alongside student groups to normalize rejection and non-linear career paths. By highlighting stories of setbacks, pivots, and uncertainty, institutions can counteract the norms reinforced by LinkedIn. Rather than emphasizing constant achievement and the need to join early to secure internships, students will perceive a more realistic understanding of success—one that is built on failure and growth.


Alternatively, students can adopt smaller-scale interventions to reduce stress at the individual level. One immediate intervention includes curating one’s digital environment by muting or unfollowing accounts that trigger any negative comparison. Students must also actively remind themselves that social media is “fake,” and that LinkedIn posts are often curated highlights that obscure any rejection or failure. Understanding that worth is not a reflection of your resume and career timelines is not the same for everyone, and is essential in disrupting cycles of comparison. Normalizing conversations with peers about feeling behind or dealing with the stress and pressures of the professional world can reveal how common these experiences really are. What feels like a personal struggle is oftentimes shared by many, and it is within these conversations that this article emerges.

Comments


bottom of page